Most independent optometry practices spend either too little on marketing and stay invisible, or they spend without a plan and have no idea whether it is working. The short answer to the question of how much to spend is this: somewhere between 3% and 8% of your annual gross revenue, depending on where your practice is in its growth cycle, how competitive your local market is, and what your goals are for the next 12 to 24 months.
If you are a well-established practice in a stable market with a strong referral base and you simply want to maintain your position, the lower end of that range is reasonable. If you are in a market with increasing competition from private equity–backed chains or retail optical, or if you are trying to actively add new patients, you will likely need to be closer to the 6% to 8% range to move the needle.
What matters more than any single percentage, though, is whether you have a structured way to allocate, track, and evaluate what you are spending. Most practices do not. They have a loose collection of expenses—a directory listing here, a boosted social post there, maybe a sign outside—and they call that a marketing budget. This article is about replacing that loose collection with a clear framework you can actually manage.
Every article on this blog is grounded in the same structured approach that powers Executive Board™. Try it for 30 days — no card required.
The 3–8% of revenue figure is not unique to optometry. It comes from decades of small business research and has been echoed by healthcare consulting firms, optometry-specific practice management advisors, and general small business resources including the U.S. Small Business Administration. The logic behind it is straightforward: marketing is a growth and maintenance cost, not a fixed cost, so it makes sense to scale it proportionally to the size of the business you are trying to protect and grow.
The limit of the percentage benchmark is that it tells you how much to spend without telling you how to spend it or how to know if it is working. A practice spending 6% of revenue on a mix of directory listings, random social ads, and a dormant website is not getting the same return as a practice spending 6% on a structured combination of local search optimization, content marketing, and a proactive reputation management system.
So the percentage is a useful starting point—it keeps you from dramatically underspending or overspending—but it is not a strategy on its own.
There are several predictable reasons why independent practice owners end up below the 3% floor.
The first is that marketing feels like a discretionary expense rather than a structural one. When margins tighten, marketing is one of the first line items to get cut. The problem with this logic is that cutting marketing during a slow period is often what causes the slow period to persist longer than it should.
The second reason is that ODs often equate marketing with paid advertising, and paid advertising feels expensive and hard to evaluate. So they avoid it entirely rather than finding lower-cost channels—like content and search presence—that can generate patient volume at a fraction of the cost of display ads.
The third reason is that the competitive landscape was not as visible until recently. For decades, a good location, solid word-of-mouth, and a basic directory listing were enough to fill a schedule. That environment no longer exists in most markets. Patients now search online before making a call, and if your practice does not appear—or does not appear credible when it does—you are losing patients you do not even know you are losing.
One of the most useful exercises a practice owner can do is a genuine audit of what they are currently spending on marketing. Most practices undercount this significantly.
These are the obvious ones:
Most practices capture these costs reasonably well because they show up on a credit card or in an invoice.
These are where most practices have blind spots.
Owner time. If you spend two hours a week thinking about, writing, or reviewing marketing content, that time has a cost. At a conservative estimate of your hourly value as a practicing OD, two hours per week over a year adds up quickly. This does not mean you should stop spending that time, but it means you should be getting something measurable out of it.
Staff time. If your front desk team is spending time responding to online reviews, managing your social profiles, or following up with patients about referrals, that time belongs in your marketing cost column, not just your payroll column.
Unreturned opportunity cost. This one is harder to quantify, but it is real. If your practice could be generating meaningful new patient revenue from better search visibility or a more active referral program, the gap between your current state and that potential is part of the cost of underinvesting.
When practices do a full audit that includes both direct and indirect costs, they often discover they are already spending more than they thought—but without the structure to know whether any of it is working.
A flat percentage is a reasonable starting framework, but practice stage matters. Here is a more nuanced way to think about it.
Revenue: $800,000–$2M+
Competitive environment: Moderate
Goal: Maintain patient base, steady organic growth
Suggested range: 3–4% of gross revenue
A practice in this position can afford to be more selective. The core priorities are maintaining search visibility, managing online reputation actively, and producing a consistent stream of educational content that keeps the practice credible for patients who are researching eye care options.
At…17503 bytes truncated…